stAllio!'s way

I got the point when patriots with Ron Paul bumper stickers and U.S. Constitution defenders were targeted as possible terrorists by the Missouri state troopers.

I got the point.

Unfortunately, you are so lockstep and blinded you rarely get it.

How's Obama's promises panning out for you? How are you liking that no higher than 8% post-stimulus unemployment? ¶

—posted by

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX, at 11:41 AM, November 17, 2009

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116259

That's how Muslims feel about women and Christians...intolerance for either. ¶

—posted by

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX, at 11:48 AM, November 17, 2009

so it's bad to assume ron paul devotees are terrorists, but okay to assume muslims are terrorists?

nice double standard you've got there.

That's how Muslims feel about women and Christians...intolerance for either.

have you ever read the bible? you won't find a lot of tolerance for women or nonchristians in it. ¶

—posted by

stAllio!, at 12:12 PM, November 17, 2009

Hello? He used guns and killed people while shouting praises to Allah.

I can't assume a gun wielding Muslim shooting Americans is a terrorist?

Last I checked the folks with the Ron Paul bumper stickers weren't shouting praises to God while shooting up innocent Americans.

Do you live in reality anymore? ¶

—posted by

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX, at 2:26 PM, November 17, 2009

And regarding Christianity...while they certainly have their problems they do seem to have cleaned up their act in regard to violence (no more inquisitions) and treatment of women.

The Muslims are still living in the 15th Century; they practice and rigidly enforce inhumane traditions designed to push down the power of the individual in a very forced submission.

Forced submission is immoral. Submission by consent is not.

Christians no longer promote these practices.

And THAT is the difference. ¶

—posted by

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX, at 4:00 PM, November 17, 2009

since you're incapable of getting the point, i'll state it plainly:

when a muslim is accused of something, you and gary immediately assume the worst, without waiting for the facts to come in. (remember, when gary wrote his first post about hasan, the media was reporting that hasan had been killed.)

but when a christian is accused of something, you give him the benefit of the doubt.

gary, being a defense lawyer, should know better.

the fact that you don't see anything wrong with this double standard says it all, really. ¶

—posted by

stAllio!, at 5:02 PM, November 17, 2009

The American Taliban:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/#34004795 ¶

—posted by

Anonymous, at 10:11 AM, November 18, 2009

I don't give Christians the benefit of the doubt. In fact I've been quite vocal in my outrages at their hypocrisy when I see it.

However, lately I'm not seeing violence from Christians. Are you?

The facts came in immediately. A Muslim was shouting praises to Allah as he murdered innocent people at an army base.

If that's not terrorism, I don't know what is.

On the other hand, I noticed that you did not defend the christians sporting patriotic bumper stickers from being labeled terrorists, yet they didn't shoot up a bunch of people. ¶

—posted by

HOOSIERS FOR FAIR TAX, at 10:11 AM, November 18, 2009

The facts came in immediately. A Muslim was shouting praises to Allah as he murdered innocent people at an army base.

sheesh. he allegedly shouted allahu akbar, but the last i heard, this hasn't been confirmed. the fact that you believe this without confirmation only proves my point.

However, lately I'm not seeing violence from Christians. Are you?

you mean like this? ¶

—posted by

stAllio!, at 10:37 AM, November 18, 2009